Emails sent by Sarah Ferguson to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein while he was in prison have sparked outrage after being made public in newly released documents.

According to records released by the United States Department of Justice, Epstein exchanged emails with a number of wealthy and influential figures from around the world. Among them was Ferguson, whose messages have drawn particular criticism.

In one of the emails, the former Duchess of York wrote to Epstein: “My dear spectacular and special friend Jeffrey, you are a legend.” She continued by telling him she was “so proud” of him — a remark that has been described by commentators as deeply disturbing given his criminal convictions.

The messages were discussed on the podcast Palace Confidential, where journalist Jo Elvin expressed shock at the tone of the correspondence.

Elvin said the exchange made her feel “sick,” pointing out that Epstein had already been convicted of sex offences at the time of the message. She questioned how Ferguson could continue such a friendly relationship with him despite the seriousness of his crimes.

The discussion also revealed that Epstein had proposed a philanthropic project involving Ferguson. When he suggested the idea, she responded enthusiastically, praising him in the email that has now resurfaced.

Royal commentator Richard Eden admitted the revelations had changed his perception of Ferguson. He explained that although he had previously admired her ability to recover from past scandals, the newly released emails were difficult to overlook.

Eden said he found the tone of the messages “revolting,” particularly because they suggested support for Epstein while he was serving time in prison. He also noted that some communications referenced plans to celebrate Epstein’s release.

The resurfaced emails have renewed scrutiny around Epstein’s connections with prominent public figures, including members of the British royal circle.

While the correspondence does not suggest involvement in Epstein’s crimes, critics argue that maintaining such a warm relationship with a convicted offender raises serious questions about judgment and accountability.